Friday, May 31, 2019

The Real Deal Out In The Field :: essays research papers

The Real Deal Out in the FieldBeing that this will be a actually opinionated paper I concluded that I should begin this piece with an opinion. According to myself, there is no such thing as a just war. War is war no matter how much you try to justify it. You cant escape the fact that with war comes loss of life. This brings up the idea of who are we to eliminate someones life. No man should curb such responsibility. Naturally those that ca expend war or sanction war are those that will not be fighting in the trenches. To say that George W. Bush has total and complete passion for every man fighting this new type of war is nothing but ignorance at its finest. A day after the horrible attacks on the World Trade Center the pope released a statement to the press. In this statement he said, Let us beg the lord that the spiral of hatred and violence will not melt (sept. 12) then later on the catholic church building serves and ordinance allowing the use of a just war. How could it be that after the popes praises for peace the same church virtual gives its ok for a war. This is extremely contradiciary. The only conclusion one can derive from such an act is that the pope used his speech as a political ploy to downsize the visual size of involvement that the church has in all of this.With this said we now look at our own political relation for which I have nothing but disgust. If you were to watch a baseball game, they now make it mandatory (not written in stone but very highly pushed) that during the seventh inning stretch a guest will appear and sing God Bless America. To me this is a cheap ploy at instigating patriotism and forcing it upon the American people that what we are doing is right and if you dont agree with out actions then youre not a true American. What benign of a kind and caring government is this? I am a true American. I also recognize BS when I see it. If you have been alive for the past 2-3 weeks you will realize you are hearing a lot about a n anthrax scare. This again is governmental tactics. I choose to use the phrase silent weapons for quiet wars to better describe this abuse of power by our almighty government.

Thursday, May 30, 2019

I Want to Teach :: Teaching Philosophy Education Essays

I Want to TeachIf you would pee asked me two years ago what my feelings were about school, I would have told you that I hated school. At that time I was 18 with no direction for my future and nothing seemed like it had any importance to me. The precedent I decided to become a teacher is very complex because I never wanted to be a teacher until the end of 2003. What make me change my mind was a series of events and people in my vitality that impacted me both positively and negatively.This turning point in my life began in my senior year of high school. As I prepared for my senior football season I never took the time out to prepare for life after high school. The only thing that mattered was that I played good football and graduated so after that I could accept my full experience to the University of Illinois. I didnt know at that time that life wasnt that easy, but I was soon to find out. As the year went on I had more and more offers to play at different universities, but I was not paying attention to any of my mentors when they would tell me that none of these offers meant anything if I didnt have the grades. I respect my mentors as if they were father figures because they have been where I want to go and have everything that I want, but I was too ill-tempered listening to family members who would tell me that I was going pro after my first year of college. As an 18 year old, you believe what your family tells you because you think it is right because they verbalise it. Unfortunately, I found out that this was not always the case.The school year went on, and as others where preparing for the ACT and SAT, I was busy getting in trouble with the rectitude and not going to class. No one cared about anything I was doing because I was a good football player and that was all they saw. They believed that any trouble I got in to, I could get out of, but that wasnt true. I spent almost a month in the Wayne County Jail for armed robbery. It was in that respect t hat I decided to turn my life around and do what was right.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Galileo: Scientist, Scholar, Rebel Essay -- essays research papers

Seventeenth-century European study was controlled by two powerful forces the Roman Catholic church building, headed by the Pope, and ancient philosophy dominated by the 2000-year-old ideas of the Greek philosopher, Aristotle. The Church had an overwhelming influence on the lives of most Europeans. During Galileos time one in twelve people living in Rome was either a cleric or a nun.1 The Church forbid any teaching that deviated from what was taught in the Bible. To enforce this control, the Church set up the Inquisition. Galileo was targeted by the Inquisition for his observations and experiments. 2 Because his teachings differed from the socially accepted ideas of Aristotle, the Inquisition believed he should be persecuted. Even though Galileos observations were much more factual than Aristotles and, more important, backed up by experiments and the use of the telescope, he was still sentenced to house arrest for life. Galileo Galilei was born on February 15, 1564, in Pisa Italy.3 G alileo was born into a family considered nobility, and his father, Vincenzo Galilei, was an accomplished musician.4 Galileo was tutored privately and also improve by his father until the age of eleven, when his family moved to Florence and sent him to a Jesuit monastery to study medicine.5 Three years after his son began school, Vincenzo was surprised to learn Galileo had unconquerable to become a monk. Somewhat angered, his father withdrew him from the monastery, and Galileo continued his high school education in Florence. At age seventeen Galileo began college at the University of Pisa, where he reluctantly studied medicine. 6 Throughout his first term attending the university, Galileo became more interested in mathematics than medicine. A court mathematician, by the name of Ostillo Ricci, observe Galileo in his lectures.7 Impressed with Galileos knowledge, he urged Galileo change his major to mathematics. Against his fathers wishes, Galileo changed courses, and by the end of his first term he was a mathematics undergraduate.8 Galileo made his first important discovery while attending the University of Pisa. Galileo noticed a swinging lamp above him during a church sermon. Extremely bored, Galileo conducted an experiment to mark off if the amount of time in between each swing was the same. Using hi... ...i. School of Mathmatics and St. Andrews, Scotland, August 1995 available from http//www.history.mcs.standrews.ac.uk/history/mathmatics/galileo.htmlInternet. 4 ibidem5 Ibid.6 Ibid.7 rascal Meadows, The Great Scientists. Oxford University unfermented York, 1987, p. 35. 8 Deborah Hitzeroth and Sharon Heerbor, Galileo Galilei. Lucent Books Inc California, 1992, p.15.9 Ibid., p.16.10 J.V. Field, Galileo Galilei. School of Mathmatics and St. Andrews, Scotland, August 1995 available from http//www.history.mcs.standrews.ac.uk/history/mathmatics/galileo.htmlInternet.11 Ibid.12 Galileo Galilei- Astrology. Available from http//www.astrology.about.com/library/w eekly/aa0zz00b.13 Ibid.14 Ibid.17 Ibid.18 Jack Meadows, The Great Scientists. Oxford University New York, 1987, p.41.19 Deborah Hitzeroth and Sharon Heerbor, Galileo Galilei. Lucent Books Inc California, 1992, p.24.20 Jack Meadows, The Great Scientists. Oxford University New York, 1987, p.44.21 Ibid., p.45.22 Giorgio De Santillan, The Crimes of Galileo. Time Inc University of Chicago Press, 1962, p.185.23 Ibid., p.257. 24 Ibid. 25 Jack Meadows, The Great Scientists. Oxford University New York, 1987, p.48.26 Ibid

Essay on The Great Gatsby -- English Literature

Essay on The Great GatsbyThe Great Gatsby is a novel rough a man who tries to win over a womanhe had lost many years ago. Jay Gatsby is the hero in this novelbecause he stands come forth amongst the rich. Unlike the rest of the richpeople in this novel Gatsby has moral values, and the rest of them canonly grasp things of material value. Gatsby spends his whole life nerve-racking to hide the fact that he wasnt like the separates. Gatsby neverfits in among them because what he perceives of them is all wrong,they were as uncivil as anyone else. Through being little primitive thanthe rich, determination for love, being ruled by his emotions thaterase any doubt, he is quiet tempered which upholds his greatness,and he is protected by others that tell us of his importance.Gatsby is not as primitive as the rest of the rich humans, he is moremannered and civil. The people at his parties are all wild and notcivil, what you would not expect from people of this stature. Gatsbyis this way bec ause he has had to earn his money and has not justinherited it like the lazy lot of them. The only other person thatcomes close to Gatsby is snick, but we dont get to see what he wouldbe like with wealth. Throughout the novel Gatsby looks out upon thecrowd, when he comes rarify to greet prick he is very polite to everyonesurrounding him, knowing they spread rumors and lies about him. Hedoesnt think anything of it because he knows its vivid for peopleto gossip, he cant judge them on it because it is the crowd he wishesto become. Nick tells Gatsby he is better than the whole rotten bunchof them, Nick realizes this because he knows what it is like to bepoor and he knows Gatsby still acts like a poor man, but he has allt... ...new him. He always wants Nick to come with him onthings he is unsure of, like when meeting daisy for the first time ineight years (p.83). He needs others to fulfill his trustingness inhimself, it is how he got as far he did in the novel (money wise). Heonly meets new people through association with someone else in thenovel, he meets Nick through Jordan and Daisy through Nick. He islike this because he expects things to come to him like they have inthe past like his job from Meyer Wolfshiem.throng Gatsby is the hero in the novel through his modern acts,determination for love, his conquering emotions, his quiettemperament, and his protected state. A hero is someone unlike theothers and Gatsby fills this character short in the novel. Therefore Gatsby is the character and no one else should even beconsidered for his place in The Great Gatsby.

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Themes Of Change :: essays research papers

Themes of ChangeWhen you are born people are there to take care of you, love you, and guide you through smell. As you grow up and life changes, you must take charge of your own life and not become so dependent on others. Throughout the die hard of life a person will ensure many changes, whether good or bad. In A&P, The Secret Lion, and A Rose for Emily, the main characters in the stories are Sammy, the boys, and girl Emily who face changes during their lives. All of these characters are in need of change. Because of their need for change, their lives will become much better. They are filled with wonder and awe about the institution around them. No matter what type of person, everyone will encounter changes. It is part of the natural process. A person is encouraged to make these changes for the good. Sammy, the boys, and Miss Emily all encounter changes in their lives that fulfill their need to become something different.In A&P by John Updike a new cashier named Sammy is very c onfused about the concept of life. In the beginning of the story Sammy is very passive and ignorant about life. His passiveness and ignorance are brought upon by his mother sheltering him during most of his life. Sammy compares himself to another cashier who works at the A&P, Stokesie. Stokesie is twenty-two and Sammy is nineteen. Sammy sees a reflection of himself when he looks at Stokesie because of his lack of ambition and wanting to become nothing more than a manager of the store. When Queeny comes into the store, covering all of her leadership abilities, he sees the total opposite of himself. Queeny is like a shepherd leading a flock of sheep she is in control. Sammy recognizes Queenys headstrong attitude and he admires it very much. Queeny is just how Sammy would like to be, a headstrong person, a leader, and a person with ambition. After the conflict at the register with Queeny and the manager, Sammy decides to take charge of his life and do something for himself. Because of Sammys huge change, he is no longer passive and ignorant. He is now active and realistic toward the world and its changes.In The Secret Lion by Alberto Alvero Rios, the young boys are filled with wonder and fascination about the world. Throughout this story everything in these boys lives changes.

Themes Of Change :: essays research papers

Themes of ChangeWhen you argon born people are there to befool care of you, love you, and guide you through life. As you grow up and life changes, you must take charge of your own life and not start out so dependent on others. Throughout the course of life a person will encounter many changes, whether good or bad. In A&P, The unfathomable Lion, and A Rose for Emily, the main characters in the stories are Sammy, the boys, and Miss Emily who face changes during their lives. All of these characters are in need of change. Because of their need for change, their lives will ferment much better. They are filled with wonder and awe about the world around them. No matter what type of person, everyone will encounter changes. It is part of the natural process. A person is encouraged to make these changes for the good. Sammy, the boys, and Miss Emily all encounter changes in their lives that fulfill their need to become something different.In A&P by John Updike a young narrator named Samm y is very confused about the concept of life. In the beginning of the story Sammy is very passive and ignorant about life. His passiveness and ignorance are brought upon by his nonplus sheltering him during most of his life. Sammy compares himself to another cashier who works at the A&P, Stokesie. Stokesie is twenty-two and Sammy is nineteen. Sammy sees a reflection of himself when he looks at Stokesie because of his lack of ambition and wanting to become nothing more than a manager of the store. When Queeny comes into the store, showing all of her leadership abilities, he sees the total opposite of himself. Queeny is like a shepherd leading a flock of sheep she is in control. Sammy recognizes Queenys headstrong attitude and he admires it very much. Queeny is just how Sammy would like to be, a headstrong person, a leader, and a person with ambition. After the contrast at the register with Queeny and the manager, Sammy decides to take charge of his life and do something for himself . Because of Sammys huge change, he is no longer passive and ignorant. He is now active and earthy toward the world and its changes.In The Secret Lion by Alberto Alvero Rios, the young boys are filled with wonder and fascination about the world. Throughout this story everything in these boys lives changes.

Monday, May 27, 2019

Booker T. Washington (19th century) and Martin Luther King Jr. (20th century) Essay

I. INTRODUCTIONFor decades, Booker T. cap (1856-1915) was the major blackamoor spokes humans in the eyes of black-and-blue the States. Born a slave in Virginia, majuscule was educated at Hampton Institute, Norfolk, Virginia. He began to work at the Tuskegee Institute in 1881 and built it into a center of learning and industrial and agricultural training. A handsome man and a tieful speaker, majuscule was skilled at politics. Powerful and powerful in both the dreary and snowy communities, capital letter was a confidential consultant to presidents. For long time, presidential political appointments of African-Americans were cleared through him. He was funded by Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, dined at the White House with Theodore Roosevelt and family, and was the guest of the Queen of England at Windsor Castle. Although capital letter was an accommodator, he spoke out against lynchings and worked to make separate facilities more than equal. Although he advised African-Americans to abide by segregation codes, he often travelled in toffee-nosed railroad cars and stayed in good hotels.Any number of historic moments in the complaisant proper(ip)s struggle form been used to identify Martin Luther King, Jr. prime removal firm of the Montgomery bus boycott, keynote speaker at the March on majuscule, youngest Nobel Peace Prize laureate. provided in retrospect, single events are less primary(prenominal) than the fact that King, and his policy of unbloody protest, was the dominant force in the civil rights grounds during its decade of greatest achievement, from 1957 to 1968.II.BOOKER T. WASHINGTONA. HISTORYBooker T. upper-case letter was born(p) a slave in Hales Ford, Virginia, reportedly on April 5, 1856. After emancipation, his family was so p everyplacety stricken that he worked in salt furnaces and sear mines beginning at age nine. Always anintelligent and curious baby bird, he yearned for an education and was frustrated when he c ould not receive good naturaliseing locally. When he was 16 his parents allowed him to quit work to go to school. They had no money to help him, so he walked 200 miles to attend the Hampton Institute in Virginia and paid his knowledge and board on that point by working as the janitor. Dedicating himself to the idea that education would raise his people to equality in this realm, Washington became a teacher. He number 1 taught in his home town, then at the Hampton Institute, and then in 1881, he founded the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute in Tuskegee, Alabama. As head of the Institute, he traveled the country unceasingly to raise funds from blacks and whites both soon he became a well-known speaker. In 1895, Washington was asked to speak at the opening of the cotton fiber States Exposition, an unprecedented honor for an African American.His battle of Atlanta Compromise speech explained his major thesis, that blacks could secure their constitutional rights through their own economic and moral approach quite an than through legal and political changes. Although his conciliatory stand angered some blacks who feared it would encourage the foes of equal rights, whites approved of his views. Thus his major achievement was to win over diverse elements among southern whites, without whose support the programs he envisioned and brought into being would have been impossible. In addition to Tuskegee Institute, which still educates many today, Washington instituted a variety of programs for rude extension work, and helped to establish the National lightlessness Business League. Shortly after the election of President William McKinley in 1896, a movement was set in cause that Washington be formd to a political hackinet post, but he withdrew his name from consideration, preferring to work outside the political arena. He died on November 14, 1915.From 1872 to 1875, he attended the Hampton Institute, an industrial school for blacks in Hampton, Virginia. He became a teacher at the institute in 1879. Washington based many of his educational theories on his training at Hampton. In 1881, Washington founded and became principal of Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute. He started this school in an old abandoned church and a shanty. The schools name was later changed to Tuskegee Institute (now Tuskegee University). The school taught specific trades, such as carpentry, farming, and mechanics, and trained teachers. As it expanded, Washingtonspent much of his time raising funds. Under Washingtons leadership, the institute became famous as a model of industrial education. The Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site, established in 1974, includes Washingtons home, student-make college buildings, and the George Washington Carver Museum. Though Washington offered little that was innovative in industrial education, which both Federal philanthropic foundations and southern leaders were already promoting, he became its principal(prenominal) black exemplar and spokesman.In his advocacy of Tuskegee Institute and its educational method, Washington revealed the political adroitness and accommodationist philosophy that were to characterize his career in the astrayr arena of range leadership. He convinced southern white employers and governors that Tuskegee offered an education that would progress blacks down on the farm and in the trades. To prospective northern donors and particularly the new self- made millionaires such as Rockefeller and Carnegie he promised the inculcation of the Protestant work ethic. To blacks living within the limited horizons of the post- reconstruction confederation, Washington held out industrial education as the means of escape from the web of sharecropping and debt and the achievement of attain fit, petit-bourgeois goals of self-employment, landownership, and small business. Washington cultivated local white approval and secured a small state appropriation, but it was northern do lands tha t made Tuskegee Institute by 1900 the scoop-support black educational institution in the country.Washington was married three times. His beginning wife, Fannie N. Smith, his sweetheart from Malden, gave birth to a child in 1883, the year after their marriage, but died prematurely the next year. In 1885 Washington married Olivia Davidson they had two children. This too was a short marriage, for she had suffered from physical maladies for years and died in 1889. Four years later he married Margaret J. Murray, a Fisk graduate who had replaced Davidson as lady principal. She remained Washingtons wife for the rest of his life, percentage to raise his three children and continuing to play a major role at Tuskegee.As Tuskegee Institute grew it branched out into otherwise endeavors. The annual Tuskegee Negro Conferences, inaugurated in 1892, sought solutions forimpoverished black farmers through crop diversity and education. The National Negro Business League, founded in 1900, gave encou ragement to black enterp progresss and humanityized their conquestes. Margaret Washington hosted womens conferences on campus. Washington established National Negro Health Week and called attention to minority health acts in addresses nationwide.By the mid-1880s Washington was proper a fixture on the nations lecture circuit. This exposure both drew attention and dollars to Tuskegee and allowed the black educator to articulate his philosophy of racial promotional material. In a notable 1884 address to the National Education Association in Madison, Wisconsin, Washington touted education for Negroesbrains, property, and characteras the key to black advancement and acceptance by white southerners. Separate but equal railroad and other prevalent facilities were acceptable to blacks, he argued, as long as they authentically were equal.This speech foreshadowed the accommodationist racial compromises he would preach for the rest of his life. During the 1880s and 1890s Washington went out of his way to soft-pedal racial insults and attacks on blacks (including himself) by whites. He courted southern white politicians who were racial moderates, arguing that black Americans had to exhibit good citizenship, hard work, and elevated character in order to win the respect of the break dance sort of whites. Full political and social equality would result in all due time, he maintained.B. GOALSWashington believed that blacks could benefit more from a practical, vocational education rather than a college education. Most blacks lived in poverty in the rural South, and Washington felt they should learn skills, work hard, and acquire property. He believed that the teaching of work skills would lead to economic prosperity. Washington predicted that blacks would be granted civil and political rights after gaining a strong economic foundation. He explained his theories in Up from Slavery and in other publications. During Bookers lifetime, many African Americans were former sla ves who did not have an education. Bookers goal was to provide African Americans with opportunities to learn vocational skills and obtain aneducation. He thought former slaves would gain acceptance through education and financial independence.C. METHODSIn the late 1800s, more and more blacks became victims of lynchings and Jim Crow laws that segregated blacks. To reduce racial conflicts, Washington advised blacks to stop demanding equal rights and to simply get along with whites. He urged whites to give blacks better jobs. In a speech given in Atlanta, Georgia, in 1895, Washington declared In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress. This speech was often called the Atlanta Compromise because Washington genuine inequality and segregation for blacks in exchange for economic advancement. The speech was widely quoted in publishers and helped make him a prominent national figure and black sp okesman. Washington became a shrewd political leader and advised not only Presidents, but also members of congress and governors, on political appointments for blacks and sympathetic whites. He urged wealthy people to contribute to various black organizations. He also owned or financially supported many black newspapers. In 1900, Washington founded the National Negro Business League to help black business firms.Throughout his life, Washington tried to please whites in both the North and the South through his public actions and his speeches. He never publicly supported black political causes that were unpopular with Confederate whites. However, Washington secretly financed lawsuits opposing segregation and upholding the right of blacks to vote and to serve on juries. Washington offered black acquiescence in disfranchisement and social segregation if whites would encourage black progress in economic and educational opportunity. Washingtons position so pleased whites, North and South , that they made him the new black spokesman. He became powerful, having the deciding voice in Federal appointments of African Americans and in philanthropic grants to black institutions. Through subsidies or secret partnerships, he controlled black newspapers, stifling critics.Overawed by his power and hoping his tactics would work, many blacks went along. However, increasingly during his last years, such black intellectuals as W.E.B. Du Bois, John Hope, andWilliam Monroe Trotter denounced his surrender of civil rights and his stressing of training in crafts, some obsolete, to the neglect of liberal education. Opposition revolve around in the Niagara Movement, founded in 1905, and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored concourse, which succeeded it in 1910.Washingtons power involved not only close relationships with influential white political leaders and industrialists but also a secret network of contacts with journalists and various organizations. He schemed w ith white and black Alabamians to try to keep other black schools from locating near Tuskegee. He engineered political appointments for supporters in the black community as a way of solidifying his own power base. He planted spies in organizations unfriendly to him to report on their activities and at one time even used a detective agency briefly. Despite public denials, Washington owned partial interests in some minority newspapers. This allowed him to plant stories and to influence their news coverage and editorial stands in ways beneficial to himself. reference in the mid-1880s, and lasting for some twenty years, he maintained a clandestine relationship with T. Thomas Fortune, editor of the New York Age, the leading black newspaper of its day.He helped support the paper financially, was one of its stockholders, and quietly endorsed many of Fortunes militant stands for voting and other civil rights and against lynching. He also supported the Afro-American League, a civil rights o rganization founded by Fortune in 1887. Washington secretly provided financial and legal support for court challenges to all-white juries in Alabama, segregated transportation facilities, and disfranchisement of black voters. As black suffrage decreased nonetheless around the turn of the century, Washington struggled to keep a modicum of black influence and despite in the Republican party in the South. From 1908 to 1911 he played a major, though covert, role in the successful effort to get the U.S. Supreme speak to to overturn a harsh Alabama peonage law under which Alonzo Bailey, a black Alabama farmer, had been convicted.1. DISSENT Lawful RightsBooker T. Washingtons methods include speeches, arguments, and agreements with both races blacks and whites, without having to associate violence to achieve these goals.D. ACCOMPLISHMENTSh As Washingtons influence with whites and blacks grew he reaped several honors. In 1901 he wrote a bestseller called Up From Slavery his autobiography. He also became an advisor to the President of the United States Theodore Roosevelt. He became the showtime black ever to dine at the White House with the President. This arrive atd a huge scandal. Many white people thought that it was wrong for whites and blacks to mix socially, and for their President to do it horrified them. Roosevelt defended his actions at the time, and he continue to ask for Washingtons advice, but he never invited him back. Eventually Washingtons leadership of blacks began to decline. It became apparent that the white people that had gained control of Southern institutions after Reconstruction did not ever want the civil and political status of blacks to improve regardless of how hard they worked or how much character they had.They passed laws to keep them from voting and to keep them from mixing with whites in schools, stores and restaurants. Many blacks came to believe that a more forceful, demanding approach was needed. By the last years of his life, W ashington had moved away from many of his accommodationist policies. address out with a new frankness, Washington attacked racism. In 1915 he joined ranks with former critics to protest the stereotypical portrayal of blacks in a new movie, endure of a Nation. Some months later he died at age 59. A man who overcame near-impossible odds himself, Booker T. Washington is best remembered for helping black Americans rise up from the economic slavery that held them down long after they were legally free citizens. Was chosen in 1861 to head the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Instituteh Caused Tuskegee Institute to grow into one of the worlds leading centers of education for African-Americansh Founded the National Negro Business League in 1900h well-advised Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft on racial mattersh Wrote an autobiography, Up From Slavery in 1901h Stressed the importance of education and employment for African-Americansh Became a chief instance for his raceh Advocated cooperation between the racesh His views caused strife with other African-American leaders, especially W.E.B. Dubois, although in his later years he began to agree with them on the best methods to achieving equalityClose analysis of Washingtons autobiographies and speeches reveals a vagueness and subtlety to his message lost on most people of his time, whites and blacks alike. He never state that American minorities would forever forgo the right to vote, to gain a full education, or to enjoy the fruits of an integrated society. But he strategically chose not to force the issue in the face of the overwhelming white hostility that was the reality of American race relations in the late nineteenth and early ordinal centuries. In this sense, he did what he had to do to assure the survival of himself and the people for whom he spoke.III.MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.A. HISTORYKing was born on Jan. 15, 1929, in Atlanta, Georgia. He was the second oldest child of Alberta Williams King and Martin Luther King. He had an older sister, Christine, and a younger brother, A. D. The young Martin was usually called M. L. His father was pastor of the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta. One of Martins grandfathers, A. D. Williams, also had been pastor there. In high school, Martin did so well that he skipped both the 9th and 12th grades. At the age of 15, he entered Morehouse College in Atlanta. King became an help of Benjamin E. Mays, Morehouses president and a well-known scholar of black religion. Under Mayss influence, King decided to become a minister.King was official just before he graduated from Morehouse in 1948. He entered Crozer Theological Seminary in Chester, Pennsylvania, to earn a divinity degree. King then went to graduate school at Boston University, where he got a Ph.D. degree in theology in 1955. In Boston, he met Coretta Scott of Marion, Alabama, a music student. They were married in 1953. The Kings had quaternary childrenYolanda, Dexter, Martin, and B ernice. In 1954, King became pastor of the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery, Alabama.In December 5, 1955 King began to be significant in the changing of the coloured mans way of life. The boycott of the Montgomery Bus was begun when Rosa Parks refused to surrender her seat on a bus to a white man on December 1st. Two Patrolmen took her away to the police station where she was booked. He and 50 other ministered held a meeting and agreed to start a boycott on December 5th, the day of Rosa Parkss hearing. This boycott would probably be successful since 70% of the riders were black. The buscompany did not take them seriously, because if there was bad weather, they would have to take the bus.The Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA)was established to co-ordinate the boycott. They had a special agreement with black cab companies, in which they were allowed to get a ride for a much cheaper price than normal. raws had to walk to work, and so they did not have time to do any obtain and therefore the sales decreased dramatically. On January 30, while M.L was making a speech, his house was flush ited. Luckily his wife and baby had left the living room when the bomb exploded, but a black mob formed and was angry about what had happened, and Policemen were sent to the scene to control the situation, even though they were outnumbered. King, however, because of his strong belief in nonviolence, urged the crowd to not use their guns and to go home.What made Martin Luther King striking was his conviction on non-violence. He believed that this belief could give blacks a superior level of morality over whites. This ideology was important for his success in later years. As a result, it helped restrain the use of violence fromwhites to blacks and vice versa. This philosophy was time-tested during the Montgomery bus boycott. Before the successful boycott, blacks used violence in order to protest racism. During the boycott, however, on both sides violence was not a footprint to be taken. When someone bombed Kings home,the fact that violence was used against a nonviolent group made the idea of the black mans cause more agreeable.B. GOALSIn 1967, King became more critical of American society than ever before. He believed poverty was as great an evil as racism. He said that true social justice would require a redistribution of wealth from the rich to the low-down. Thus, King began to plan a Poor Peoples Campaign that would unite pathetic people of all races in a struggle for economic opportunity. The hunting expedition would demand a federal guaranteed annual income for poor people and other major antipoverty laws.Also in 1967, King attacked U.S. support of South Vietnam in the Vietnam War (1957-1975). He regarded the South Vietnamese government as corrupt and undemocratic. Many supporters of the war denounced Kings criticisms, but the growing antiwar movement welcomed his comments.Dr. King and the SCLC organized drives for African-American v oter registration, desegregation, and better education and living accommodations throughout the South. Dr. King continued to speak. He went to many cities and towns. He wasgreeted by crowds of people who wanted to hear him speak. He said all people have the right to equal treatment under the law. Many people believed in these civil rights and worked hard for themDr. King believed that poverty caused much of the unrest in America. non only poverty for African-Americans, but poor whites, Hispanics and Asians. Dr. King believed that the United States involvement in Vietnam was also a factor and that the war poisoned the atmosphere of the whole country and made the solution of local problems of human relations unrealisticThis caused friction between King and the African-American leaders who felt that their problems deserved priority and that the African-American leadership should concentrate on fighting racial injustice at home. But by early 1967 Dr. King had become associated with t he antiwar movementDr. King continued his campaign for world peace. He traveled across America to support and speak out about civil rights and the rights of the underprivilegedC. METHODSKings civil rights activities began with a protest of Montgomerys segregated bus system in 1955. That year, a black passenger named Rosa Parks was arrested for disobeying a city law requiring that blacks give up their seats on buses when white people wanted to sit in their seats or in the same row. Black leaders in Montgomery urged blacks to boycott (refuse to use) the citys buses. The leaders formed an organization to run the boycott, and asked King to serve as president. In his first speech as leader of the boycott, King told his black colleagues First and foremost, we are American citizens. We are not here advocating violence. The only machine that we have is the weapon of protest. The great glory of American democracy is the right to protest for right.Terrorists bombed Kings home, but King continued to insist on nonviolent protests. Thousands of blacks boycotted the buses for over a year. In 1956,the United States Supreme Court ordered Montgomery to provide equal, integrated seating on public buses. The boycotts success won King national fame and identified him as a symbol of Southern blacks new efforts to fight racial injustice.With other black ministers, King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in 1957 to expand the nonviolent struggle against racism and discrimination. At the time, widespread segregation existed throughout the South in public schools, and in transportation, recreation, and such public facilities as hotels and restaurants. Many states also used various methods to deprive blacks of their voting rights. In 1960, King moved from Montgomery to Atlanta to devote more effort to SCLCs work. He became co-pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church with his fatherIn the North, however, King soon discovered that young and angry blacks cared litt le for his treatment and even less for his pleas for peaceful protest. Their disenchantment was one of the reasons he rallied behind a new cause the war in Vietnam.Although he was trying to create a new coalition based on equal support for peace and civil rights, it caused an immediate rift. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) saw Kings shift of emphasis as a serious tactical mistake the Urban League warned that the limited resources of the civil-rights movement would be spread too thinBut from the vantage point of history, Kings timing was superb. Students, professors, intellectuals, clergymen and reformers rushed into the movement. Then, King turned his attention to the domestic issue that he felt was directly related to the Vietnam struggle poverty. He called for a guaranteed family income, he threatened national boycotts, and he spoke of disrupting entire cities by nonviolent camp-ins. With this in mind, he began to plan a massive border dist rict of the poor on Washington, D.C., envisioning a demonstration of such intensity and size that Congress would have to recognize and deal with the huge number of desperate and downtrodden Americans.King interrupted these plans to lend his support to the Memphis sanitation mens strike. He wanted to discourage violence, and he wanted to focus national attention on the plight of the poor, unorganized workers of the city. The men were bargaining for basic union representation and long-overdue raises. But he never got back to his poverty plans.1. DISSENTLawful Rights While at seminary King became acquainted with Mohandas Gandhis philosophy of nonviolent social protest. On a trip to India in 1959 King met with followers of Gandhi. During these discussions he became more convinced than ever that nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience was the most soused weapon available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom. He also used his speeches and demonstrations as tools to acco mplish his goals such as the I suffer A Dream Speech, and the Montgomery Bus Boycott.D. ACCOMPLISHMENTSAn African American Baptist minister, was the main leader of the civil rights movement in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s. He had a magnificent speaking ability, which enabled him to effectively express the demands of African Americans for social justice. Kings eloquent pleas won the support of millions of peopleblacks and whitesand made him internationally famous. He won the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize for leading nonviolent civil rights demonstrations.In spite of Kings stress on nonviolence, he often became the print of violence. White racists threw rocks at him in Chicago and bombed his home in Montgomery, Alabama. Finally, violence ended Kings life at the age of 39, when an assassin cranny and killed him. Some historians view Kings death as the end of the civil rights era that began in the mid-1950s. Under his leadership, the civil rights movement won wide support am ong whites, and laws that had barred integration in the Southern States were abolished. Kingbecame only the second American whose birthday is observed as a national holiday. The first was George Washington, the nations first president.King and other civil rights leaders then organized a massive march in Washington, D.C. The event, called the March on Washington, was intended to highlight African-American unemployment and to urge Congress to pass Kennedys bill. On Aug. 28, 1963, over 200,000 Americans, including many whites, gathered at the Lincoln Memorial in the capital. The high point of the rally, Kings stirring I Have a Dream speech, eloquently defined the moral basis of the civil rights movement.The movement won a major victory in 1964, when Congress passed the civil rights bill that Kennedy and his successor, President Lyndon B. Johnson, had recommended. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited racial discrimination in public places and called for equal opportunity in employmen t and education. King later received the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize.In 1965, King helped organize protests in Selma, Ala. The demonstrators protested against the efforts of white officials there to deny most black citizens the chance to register and vote. Several hundred protesters attempted to march from Selma to Montgomery, the state capital, but police officers used tear gasconade and clubs to break up the group. The bloody attack, broadcast nationwide on television news shows, shocked the public. King immediately announced another attempt to march from Selma to Montgomery. Johnson went before Congress to request a bill that would eliminate all barriers to Southern blacks right to vote. Within a few months, Congress approved the select Rights Act of 1965By 1965, King had come to believe that civil rights leaders should pay more attention to the economic problems of blacks. In 1966, he helped begin a major civil rights campaign in Chicago, his first big effort outside the South. Lea ders of the campaign tried to organize black inner-city residents who suffered from unemployment, bad housing, and poor schools. The leaders also protested against real estate practices that kept blacks from living in many neighborhoods and suburbs. King believed such practices played a majorrole in trapping poor blacks in urban ghettos.King and the local leaders also organized marches through white neighborhoods. But angry white people in these segregated communities threw bottles and rocks at the demonstrators. Soon afterward, Chicago officials promised to encourage fair housing practices in the city if King would stop the protests. King accepted the offer, and the Chicago campaign ended.IV.COMPARING/CONTRASTINGWashington kept his white following by conservative policies and moderate utterances, but he faced growing black and white liberal opposition in the Niagara Movement (1905-9) and the NAACP (1909-), groups demanding civil rights and encouraging protest in response to white a ggressions such as lynchings, disfranchisement, and segregation laws. Washington successfully fended off these critics, often by underhanded means. At the same time, however, he tried to translate his own personal success into black advancement through secret sponsorship of civil rights suits, serving on the boards of Fisk and Howard universities, and directing philanthropic aid to these and other black colleges.His speaking tours and private persuasion tried to gibe public educational opportunities and to reduce racial violence. These efforts were generally unsuccessful, and the year of Washingtons death marked the beginning of the Great Migration from the rural South to the urban North. Washingtons racial philosophy, pragmatically adjusted to the limiting conditions of his own era, did not survive the change.Martin Luther Kings contributions to our history places him in this inimitable position. In his short life, Martin Luther King was instrumental in helping us realize and rect ify those unspeakable flaws which were tarnishing the name of America. The events which took place in and around his life were priming shattering, for they represented an America which was hostile and quite different from America as we see it today. Black Americans needed a Martin Luther King, but above all America needed him. The significant qualities of this special man cannot be underestimated nor takenfor granted.Within a span of 13 years from 1955 to his death in 1968 he was able to expound, expose, and extricate America from many wrongs. His tactics of protest involved non-violent passive resistance to racial injustice. It was the right prescription for our country, and it was right on time. Hope in America was waning on the part of many Black Americans, but Martin Luther King, Jr. provided a candle along with a light. He also provided this nation with a road map so that all people could locate and share together in the abundance of this great democracy.We honor Dr. Martin Lu ther King, Jr. because he showed us the way to mend those broken fences and to move on in building this land rather than destroying it. He led campaign after campaign in the streets of America and on to the governors mansion even to the White House in an effort to secure change.

Sunday, May 26, 2019

Capitalism & Socialism

A Better Change in parliamentary law Socialism and capitalist economy are two different types of political sympathies. Socialism is the society were the government takes charge of both souls. There is no personal responsibility and the government takes e precisething but most personal vacatedoms are gone. capitalism is an economical system in which wealth and the productions of wealth are privately admited and controlled rather than cosmos state receiveed and controlled. Socialism critiqued capitalism for be an unfair economic structure.Before Socialism, the government was not engaged with the people, products and businesses, and taxes and conformationes were all in all functioning differently wen Capitalism was in play. What Capitalism really involves of is laissez faire, which means to let it be. In capitalism, the means of production is possess, ran, and traded for the office of making profits for private owners. Capitalisms importance is on individual profit inste ad of workers or society as a whole.However, on the Socialism side, all people should be given an equal opportunity to advance and workers should have more rights and treated better. Socialism emphasis more on profits being distributed among the society to receiving a better wage. Capitalism was a cadence where government did not do much and let individuals to own their factories, houses, goods, etc. and put their own prices on them. Production are privately owned and utilize for a private profit. This gives motivations for producers to engage in economic activity.Once Socialism came to be, government began to act and the productions became socially owned with the surplus value produced increasing to either all of society or to all the workers of the business. The economy back in Capitalism was not very stable. Employment with low wages was affecting everyone except the rich. In socialism, there are the rich, middle and lower classes, but in capitalism there is no class that does not have its basic needs encountered. In this type of government the rich, middle and lower classes are taxed depending on their salary, the more money make the more the tax.Taxes benefit the people and are used to contribute any of there programs and Capitalism has similar traits. However, in Capitalism it was more of a corroborate to the rich only. The rich individuals goal for their business is maximizing wealth or the price of the stock of the business in order to make owners as besotted as possible just like a free market economy, but does not befit the lower classes at all. In the Socialists point of view, Capitalism was considered an unfair form of government.Capitalism interested more on individuals own wealth, goods, and profits, which only benefited the rich class while the middle and lower class, had to work very sound to be able to get their money. That is why Socialism started and make everything equal for everyone. The rich were taxed more so that it would be fair any wasted the homogeneous as what a middle or lower class would waste. An important part of Socialism was that government had been more into their society and now government began to own factories, houses, and property and put it cost on it and nobody owned anything without government being engaged.Capitalism & SocialismA Better Change in Society Socialism and Capitalism are two different types of government. Socialism is the society were the government takes care of all individuals. There is no personal responsibility and the government owns everything but most personal freedoms are gone. Capitalism is an economical system in which wealth and the productions of wealth are privately owned and controlled rather than being state owned and controlled. Socialism critiqued capitalism for being an unfair economic structure.Before Socialism, the government was not engaged with the people, products and businesses, and taxes and classes were all functioning differently wen Capitalism was in play. What Capitalism really involves of is laissez faire, which means to let it be. In capitalism, the means of production is owned, ran, and traded for the purpose of making profits for private owners. Capitalisms importance is on individual profit instead of workers or society as a whole.However, on the Socialism side, all people should be given an equal opportunity to succeed and workers should have more rights and treated better. Socialism emphasis more on profits being distributed among the society to receiving a better wage. Capitalism was a time where government did not do much and let individuals to own their factories, houses, goods, etc. and put their own prices on them. Production are privately owned and used for a private profit. This gives motivations for producers to engage in economic activity.Once Socialism came to be, government began to act and the productions became socially owned with the surplus value produced increasing to either all of society or to all th e workers of the business. The economy back in Capitalism was not very stable. Employment with low wages was affecting everyone except the rich. In socialism, there are the rich, middle and lower classes, but in capitalism there is no class that does not have its basic needs encountered. In this type of government the rich, middle and lower classes are taxed depending on their salary, the more money made the more the tax.Taxes benefit the people and are used to support any of there programs and Capitalism has similar traits. However, in Capitalism it was more of a support to the rich only. The rich individuals goal for their business is maximizing wealth or the price of the stock of the business in order to make owners as wealthy as possible just like a free market economy, but does not befit the lower classes at all. In the Socialists point of view, Capitalism was considered an unfair form of government.Capitalism interested more on individuals own wealth, goods, and profits, which only benefited the rich class while the middle and lower class, had to work very hard to be able to get their money. That is why Socialism started and made everything equal for everyone. The rich were taxed more so that it would be fair any wasted the same as what a middle or lower class would waste. An important part of Socialism was that government had been more into their society and now government began to own factories, houses, and property and put it cost on it and nobody owned anything without government being engaged.

Saturday, May 25, 2019

Finance and banking Essay

Chapter 11. Has the inflation rate in Canada increased or decreased in the past few years? What about(predicate) interest rates?R/. The inflation rate of CAnada is low. The inflation rate was at 1.10 % in August. And the interest rate was declining. In one news verbalize that on 1915 until 2013, the Canadas inflation rate 3.2% reaching an all time high of 21.6% in June of 1920 and got a record low at -17.8% in June of 1921.2. If history repeats itself and we see a decline in the rate of money growth, what strength you expect to happen to A. Real output is sacking downB. the inflation rate, and is going downC. Interest rates is going downAll are going to hit.3. When was the most recent recession?According to the National Bureau of scotch Research (the official arbiter of U.S. recessions), there were 10 recessions between 1948 and 2011. And the recent recession started in December 2007 and finished in June 2009.4. When interest rates fall, how might you change your economic b ehaviour? I will demoralise a car and house because the cost of them would fall. I call in when the rates fall is practiced spend more money for fail good properties and the future I can duplicate what I spend.5. Can you think of any financial base in the past ten years that has affect you personally? Has it made you better off or worse off? Why?I think all the inventions that the government made, for example the subway and trains. This made me better off, because for me I feel more comfortable with the transportation and for all the population, this made more opportunities for get a job.6. Is everybody worse off when interest rates rise?When net rest rates rise is not worse off, but for the people who dramatize for get a house or a car would be worse off for them, because will cost more to finance their purchase.7. What is the basic action at law of banks?Store moneyStoring money for customers is the most classic of banking activities. Traditional banks, credit unions and sa vings institutions offer this service. Customers use bank accounts, such as checking or uninterrupted savings accounts, because most provide safe locations to store deposited money that is FDIC-insured, or protected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.Facilitate PaymentsBanks and financial institutions modify their customers to pay others. Customers are given checks, both paper and electronic, and other payment tools, such as debit cards. A customer is able to write a check or create a payment to an extracurricular vendor, such as a grocery store, electricity company or other outside individual, with one of their designated payment tools. The financial institution sends money from the customers account to their designated payee.Loan MoneyLending money allows a bank or financial institution to earn money, according to the FDIC website. This for-profit service involves the bank lending a sum of money to a customer and then charging interest as the added amount is repaid back to the institution. Loans are used to purchase or lease automobiles, buy homes, refinance mortgages, perform home repairs and other expensive projects.12.How does a fall in the value of the pound sterling affect British consumers?R/. This will makes the foreign goods expensive and the British are not going to buy this foreign goods because they are going to choose for the cheaper one.13.How does an increase in the value of the pound sterding affect American businesses?R/. For American business will be easier for sell their goods and they can sell it in the United States or abroad.14.When the dollar is worth more in relation to currencies of other countries, are you more liable(predicate) to buy American-made or foreign-made jean ? Are U.S.companies that make jeans happier when the dollar is strong or when it is weak? What about American company that is in the business of import jeans into the United States?R/. In the mid-to late 1970s and in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the value of the dollar was low, making travel abroad relatively more expensive thus it was a good time to vacation in the United States and see the Grand Canyon. With the rise in the dollars value in the early 1980s, travel abroad became relatively cheaper, making it a good time to visit the Tower of London.Chapter 21.Why is a dispense of IBM common stocks an as assign for its owner and a liability for IBM?The share of IBM stock is an asset for its owner because it entitles the owner to a share of the earnings and assets of IBM. The share is a liability for IBM because it is a claim on its earnings and assets by the owner of the share.2.If I can buy a car today for $5000and it is worth $10,OOO in extra income next year to me because it enables me to get a job as a travelinganvil seller, Should I take out a loan from Larry the loan Shark at a 90% interest rate if no one else will give me a loan? Will I be better or worse off as a result of taking out this loan? Can you make a shell for legalizing loan-sharking?I should take out a loan from Larry, if I make a case for legalizing that would give problem and can affect the bank. Its not good make a case.3.Some economists suspect that one of the reasons that economies in developing countries so slowly is that they do not suck well-developed financial markets. Does this argument make sense?Yes, because the absence of financial markets means that funds cannot be channeled to people who have the most productive use for them. Entrepreneurs then cannot acquire funds to set up businesses that would help the economy grow rapidly.10. If you are an employer, what kinds of moral hazard problems might you worry about with your employees?R/. I would be concerned that they have their own responsibilities and they might steal things or do not good behaviour.11.If there were asymetwmthe information that a borrower and a lender had, could there stiIl be a moral hazard problem?Yes, because even if you know that a borrower is taki ng actions that might jeopardize paying off the loan, you must still stop the borrower from doing so. Because that whitethorn be costly, you may not spend the time and effort to reduce moral hazard, and so the problem of moral hazard still exists.14.How does risk sharing benefit both financial intermediaries and private authoriseors?Risk sharing benefits and financial intermediaries are able to earn a spread.Investors benefit are able to invest in good diversified portfolio.

Friday, May 24, 2019

Conflict in the Hunger Games Essay

An important struggle in the novel The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins, is the conflict between the districts and the Capitol. This conflict is important to the text as a whole because the result of this conflict was the Hunger Games. The Hunger Games are a punishment for a forward uprising, where two tributes from each district are chosen to fight to death in an arena. The main protagonist, Katniss Everdeen, becomes an important figurehead of the districts growing resentment of the Capitol when she takes the place of her junior sister Prim as a tribute in the Hunger Games. This essay will explore the reason behind the conflict, Katniss involvement in the conflict and the conflicts importance to the novel as a whole.The conflict between the districts and the Capitol exists because of the inequality between the rich Capitol and the poor districts. Katniss describes District 12 as a place where you post starve to death in safety. In contrast Katniss describes the Capitol with the m agnificence of its glistening buildings and where food appears at the press of a button. It is this inequality that caused conflict between the Capitol and the districts, leading to a previous uprising which saw the complete destruction of District 13 and the birth of the Hunger Games. As Katniss explains, the Hunger games were the Capitols way of reminding us how totally we are at their mercy. When Katniss volunteers as tribute in place of her sister, she becomes a key component in the ongoing conflict between the districts and the Capitol.When Katniss volunteers as tribute for District 12, the district responds with a baffling form of rebellion which shows the conflict that exists between the districts and the Capitol. To the everlasting opinion of the people ofdistrict 12, not one person claps. I stand there unmoving while they take part in the boldest form of refuse they can manage. Silence. Which says we do not agree. We do not condone. All of this is wrong. During the compe tition Katniss continues with these subtle forms of rebellion through wearing the Mockingjay pin, holding hands with Peeta at the hatchway ceremony, showing respect for her fallen comrade from district 11, Rue and finally with her and Peetas final stand.To deny the Capitol a victor for the Hunger Games, Katniss and Peeta threaten to pop out themselves by eating the deadly nightlock berries. The Capitol are forced to declare two victors which causes even greater conflict between Katniss and the Capitol. As Haymitch explains, The one thing the Capitol cant stand is being laughed at and they are the joke of Panem.The conflict is based on the inequality between the rich Capitol and the poor districts. Through subtle acts of rebellion throughout the novel of the behalf of Katniss the conflict grows. This conflict is important to the text as a whole because without the conflict between the districts and the Capitol there would be no Hunger Games.